Ethical Principles And Bias In Physical Education Tests And Measurements: A Critical Review And Implications For Teachers

Authors

  • Ilham Kamaruddin Universitas Negeri Makassar Author
  • Ahmad Maulana Universitas Negeri Makassar Author
  • Sri Samawi Universitas Negeri Makassar Author
  • Matelda Rambung Salissing Universitas Negeri Makassar Author
  • Hariyono Universitas Negeri Makassar Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26858/cjpko.v18i1.498

Keywords:

Ethics, Bias, Measurement, Implications, Teachers

Abstract

Ethical principles are fundamental to ensuring the validity, fairness, and educational value of tests and measurements in physical education. Nevertheless, assessment practices in schools continue to face ethical challenges and various forms of bias that may compromise objectivity and the integrity of evaluation outcomes. This article aims to critically examine ethical principles and potential biases in the practice of physical education testing and measurement, as well as their implications for teachers’ professional responsibilities. Employing a qualitative approach with a critical review design, this study focuses on conceptual and reflective analysis grounded in reputable scientific literature and official policy documents related to ethics and bias in physical education assessment. Data were obtained entirely from secondary sources through a systematic literature search using academic databases, including Google Scholar, ERIC, ResearchGate, and Garuda Dikti. The analysis was conducted using content analysis combined with a critical–reflective approach to identify dominant ethical themes, forms of bias, and gaps between theoretical principles and practical implementation. The findings indicate that core ethical principles in physical education testing and measurement encompass honesty, fairness, professional responsibility, objectivity, and respect for students’ dignity. Empirical evidence also reveals that stereotypical bias—particularly related to teachers’ assumptions about students’ gender, cultural background, and physical condition—remains a prevalent issue that undermines assessment accuracy and equity. These findings highlight the necessity for physical education teachers to possess not only strong technical competencies in testing and measurement, but also high ethical awareness and reflective capacity in evaluation practices. The study concludes that the consistent application of ethical principles and effective bias management are critical to producing valid, fair, and meaningful assessments. Ultimately, ethical and unbiased evaluation practices enable physical education to more effectively support students’ physical, mental, and character development in line with comprehensive and equitable educational goals.

References

Afriyuandi, A., Rahman, A., & Putra, M. R. (2025). Ethical challenges in physical education assessment practices: A critical reflection. Journal of Physical Education and Sport Ethics, 7(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/ethics.pe.2025.001

Astuti, S. (2022). Assessment literacy of physical education teachers in Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia, 18(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpji.v18i2.48765

Bailey, R., Armour, K., Kirk, D., Jess, M., Pickup, I., & Sandford, R. (2019). The educational benefits claimed for physical education and school sport: An academic review. Research Papers in Education, 34(2), 123–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1508418

Bienkowski, M., & Means, B. (2012). Technology and assessment: Opportunities and challenges. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 31(4), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2012.00245.x

Fitrianto, A. T. (2023). Ethics and fairness in physical education evaluation. Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 22(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.24114/jik.v22i1.41234

Hasbi, H. (2025). Professional ethics development for physical education teachers. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 44(1), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2024-0067

Hay, P., & Penney, D. (2012). Assessment in physical education: A sociocultural perspective. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 17(4), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2011.594429

Hayati, R. (2024). Teacher perception bias in physical education assessment. International Journal of Instruction, 17(1), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2024.17113a

Judijanto, L., Prasetyo, E., & Kurniawan, R. (2025). Assessment practices and ethical awareness of PE teachers. Journal of Physical Education Research, 12(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.23887/jper.v12i2.55678

Kumar, K., & Vivekanandan, K. (2018). Measurement bias and objectivity in educational assessment. International Journal of Educational Measurement, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.2018.61a

Mugara, R., & Ali, E. Y. (2025). Holistic assessment in physical education learning. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 11(2), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejpe.v11i2.5123

Muzakki, M., Rahmawati, D., & Sari, P. (2025). Psychological impacts of unfair assessment in physical education. Journal of Educational Psychology and Counseling, 5(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.21070/jeepc.v5i1.2112

Rahmat, A., Sibarani, B., & Lestari, I. (2025). Bias in physical fitness testing among secondary school students. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 16(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/18377122.2025.2031145

Ridha, M., Hasanuddin, & Pratama, Y. (2025). Validity and reliability of physical fitness measurement in schools. Jurnal Keolahragaan, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v13i1.61234

Rohanita, L., & Aizah, M. A. F. (2025). Critical review methodology in educational research. Qualitative Research in Education, 14(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.2025.11345

Salsabillah, N., Hidayat, T., & Anwar, S. (2025). Professional ethics of physical education teachers. Jurnal Etika Profesi Pendidikan, 4(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/7c2mz

Sidik, Z. D., Winarno, M. E., & Saputra, A. (2025). Fairness and inclusivity in physical education assessment. Physical Education Theory and Practice, 21(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2024.2391187

Sudarman, S., Laksana, D. N., & Yuliana, R. (2025). Ethical literacy of teachers in assessment practices. Journal of Moral Education, 54(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2024.2349981

Taridala, S., & Anwar, R. (2023). Educational assessment standards and ethics in Indonesia. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 42(3), 512–524. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v42i3.59741

Thomas, J. R., Nelson, J. K., & Silverman, S. J. (2020). Research methods in physical activity (7th ed.). Human Kinetics. https://us.humankinetics.com/products/research-methods-in-physical-activity-7th-edition

West, D. M. (2011). Digital schools: How technology can transform education. Brookings Institution Press. https://www.brookings.edu/book/digital-schools/

Zhai, X., & Nehm, R. H. (2023). Ethical assessment and bias in educational measurement. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 42(2), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12520

Downloads

Published

2026-02-03

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ethical Principles And Bias In Physical Education Tests And Measurements: A Critical Review And Implications For Teachers. (2026). COMPETITOR: Jurnal Pendidikan Kepelatihan Olahraga, 18(1), 0087-0097. https://doi.org/10.26858/cjpko.v18i1.498