A Comparative Study On The Improvement Of Basketball Perimeter Shooting Skills Between Introverted And Extroverted Students At SMPN 1 Bangkalan

Muhammad Ubaidillah Eko Pratama; Fajar Hidayatullah; Septyaningrum Putri Purwoto

doi:10.26858/cpjok.v18i1.827

Authors

Muhammad Ubaidillah Eko Pratama STKIP PGRI Bangkalan Author
Fajar Hidayatullah STKIP PGRI Bangkalan Author
Septyaningrum Putri Purwoto STKIP PGRI Bangkalan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26858/cpjok.v18i1.827

Keywords:

Basketball; Perimeter Shooting; Introvert Personality; Extrovert Personality; Motor Learning.

Abstract

This study was motivated by the importance of perimeter shooting skills in basketball and the potential influence of psychological factors, particularly introverted and extroverted personality types, on the effectiveness of sports training. Perimeter shooting is one of the essential technical skills in basketball because it contributes significantly to scoring opportunities and game performance. Therefore, understanding the relationship between personality characteristics and skill improvement is important for developing effective physical education learning strategies. This study aimed to analyze the improvement of basketball perimeter shooting skills and to compare the training outcomes between introverted and extroverted students. This research employed a quantitative approach using a quasi-experimental method with a pretest–posttest group design. The sample consisted of 22 students from SMPN 1 Bangkalan selected through purposive sampling. Participants were classified into introverted and extroverted groups based on personality questionnaire results. Data were collected through perimeter shooting skill tests, personality questionnaires, observation, and documentation. Statistical analysis included normality tests, Wilcoxon tests, and Mann–Whitney tests. The results showed that the extrovert group experienced a significant improvement in perimeter shooting skills after the training intervention (p = 0.024 < 0.05), while the introvert group did not show statistically significant improvement (p = 0.176 > 0.05). However, the Mann–Whitney test indicated no significant difference between the two groups in terms of shooting skill improvement (p = 0.725 > 0.05). In conclusion, structured feedback-based training effectively improved basketball perimeter shooting skills, and personality type did not significantly determine the level of skill improvement. These findings highlight the importance of adaptive and individualized training programs in physical education learning.

References

Allen, M. S., Greenlees, I., & Jones, M. (2013). Personality in sport: A comprehensive review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 6(1), 184–208.

Abbas, A. (2026). Motor learning adaptation in basketball shooting performance. Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 12(2), 45–56.

Berliana, B., Hidayatullah, F., & Nurhasan, N. (2023). Psychological determinants of athlete performance in competitive sports. Jurnal Keolahragaan, 11(1), 55–67.

Casey, A., & MacPhail, A. (2018). Adopting a models-based approach to teaching physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(3), 294–310.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 00149.

Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Gómez, M. A., Gasperi, L., & Lupo, C. (2018). Performance analysis in basketball: Key indicators and game success. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 18(3), 364–377.

Hidayatullah, F., Rahman, A., & Syam, H. (2023). Basketball performance indicators and team success analysis. Jurnal SPORTIF, 9(2), 120–132.

Hidayatullah, F., Abbas, A., & Berliana, B. (2026). Training quality and shooting performance in basketball learning. International Journal of Sports Science, 14(1), 30–41.

Ibáñez, S. J., García-Rubio, J., & Feu, S. (2020). Basketball teaching methodologies and technical skill development. Sustainability, 12(12), 1–15.

Laborde, S., Dosseville, F., & Allen, M. (2015). Emotional intelligence and personality in sport performance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 21, 1–9.

Luo, Y., Zhang, H., & Chen, X. (2025). Fatigue, attentional focus, and basketball shooting performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 43(2), 144–156.

Magill, R. A., & Anderson, D. (2021). Motor Learning and Control: Concepts and Applications (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Mancha-Triguero, D., García-Rubio, J., Gamonales, J. M., & Ibáñez, S. J. (2019). Game performance analysis in basketball. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(22), 1–14.

Okazaki, V. H. A., Rodacki, A. L. F., & Satern, M. N. (2015). Biomechanical analysis of basketball shooting techniques. Sports Biomechanics, 14(1), 1–15.

Sari, N., Hidayatullah, F., & Arifin, Z. (2023). The effectiveness of repetitive shooting drills on basketball shooting accuracy. Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia, 19(1), 55–66.

Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2019). Motor Learning and Performance (6th ed.). Human Kinetics.

Slimani, M., Bragazzi, N. L., Znazen, H., Paravlic, A., & Tod, D. (2016). Psychological interventions and basketball shooting performance. International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice, 20(4), 1–10.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using Multivariate Statistics (7th ed.). Pearson Education.

Thomas, J. R., Nelson, J. K., & Silverman, S. J. (2015). Research Methods in Physical Activity (7th ed.). Human Kinetics.

Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2016). Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(5), 1382–1414.

Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., & Cardozo, P. (2018). Attentional focus and motor skill learning in sports. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 6(1), 1–15.