Reaction and Response Speed ​​Tests in Racket Sports: Instruments, Reliability, and Learning Applications

Authors

  • Awaluddin Universitas Negeri Makassar Author
  • Sudirman Universitas Negeri Makassar Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26858/cpjok.v18i2.982

Keywords:

Reaction Time; Response Speed; Racket Sports; Reliability; Motor Learning.

Abstract

Reaction time and response speed are critical determinants of performance in racket sports because they influence athletes’ ability to perceive stimuli, process information, make decisions, and execute motor actions efficiently. However, the rapid development of assessment technologies has created a need to evaluate the effectiveness, reliability, and educational applicability of various reaction-testing instruments. This study aimed to analyze reaction and response-speed assessment instruments used in racket sports, examine their reliability characteristics, and explore their applications in learning and coaching environments. This study employed a literature review approach by analyzing scientific articles published between 2015 and 2025 from Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, SINTA, and Garuda databases. A total of 148 articles were initially identified, with 25 studies meeting the inclusion criteria for final analysis. Data were synthesized based on instrument type, reliability indicators, sport context, and educational applications. The results revealed that technology-assisted instruments, including computerized reaction tests, FitLight systems, BlazePod devices, video-based assessments, and mobile applications, demonstrated superior reliability compared with conventional methods. Approximately 84% of the reviewed studies reported Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) above 0.80, indicating good-to-excellent reliability. FitLight and BlazePod systems exhibited the highest reliability ranges (ICC = 0.86–0.97). Furthermore, reaction-based assessments were found to enhance motor learning, decision-making ability, concentration, and athlete performance monitoring. In conclusion, modern reaction-testing instruments provide reliable, valid, and educationally valuable tools for performance assessment and learning development in racket sports. Their integration into coaching and physical education programs can support evidence-based athlete development and instructional practices.

References

Abdelmoula, A., Kridis, N., Bouhlel, E., & Chtourou, H. (2021). Reliability and validity of visual reaction time assessments in racket sport athletes. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 20(2), 245–253. https://www.jssm.org

Araújo, D., Davids, K., & Hristovski, R. (2019). The ecological dynamics of decision making in sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 42, 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.08.003

Baker, J., Wattie, N., & Schorer, J. (2022). Talent identification and development in sport: International perspectives. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 17(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541211038943

Barnett, L. M., Lai, S. K., Veldman, S. L. C., Hardy, L. L., Cliff, D. P., Morgan, P. J., & Okely, A. D. (2023). Correlates of gross motor competence in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 53(2), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01761-4

Broadbent, D. P., Causer, J., Williams, A. M., & Ford, P. R. (2022). Perceptual-cognitive skill training and its transfer to expert performance. Journal of Expertise, 5(1), 34–48. https://www.journalofexpertise.org

Buszard, T., Reid, M., Masters, R. S. W., & Farrow, D. (2021). Scaling sports equipment for children promotes functional movement and learning. Sports Medicine, 51(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01344-4

Button, C., Seifert, L., Chow, J. Y., Araújo, D., & Davids, K. (2020). Dynamics of Skill Acquisition: An Ecological Dynamics Approach (2nd ed.). Human Kinetics. https://us.humankinetics.com

Davids, K., Araújo, D., Vilar, L., Renshaw, I., & Pinder, R. (2018). An ecological dynamics approach to skill acquisition in sport. Movement & Sport Sciences, 102, 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1051/sm/2018036

Faber, I. R., Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Oosterveld, F. G. J., & Nijhuis-Van Der Sanden, M. W. G. (2019). The role of perceptual-cognitive skills in talent identification. Journal of Sports Sciences, 37(10), 1123–1131. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2018.1547096

Fajen, B. R., Riley, M. A., & Turvey, M. T. (2021). Information, affordances, and the control of action in sport performance. Ecological Psychology, 33(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2021.1882068

Fortes, L. S., Almeida, S. S., Ferreira, M. E. C., & Paes, P. P. (2021). Cognitive and perceptual responses associated with athletic performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 645128. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.645128

Gabbett, T. J., Nassis, G., Oetter, E., Pretorius, J., Johnston, N., Medina, D., & Rodas, G. (2021). The athlete monitoring cycle. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 55(11), 593–594. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102945

Giesche, F., Wicke, F. S., & Müller, H. (2020). Reliability and validity of digital reaction-time assessments in sports settings. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 24(3), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2020.1738095

Hopkins, W. G., Marshall, S. W., Batterham, A. M., & Hanin, J. (2021). Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 53(6), 1325–1332. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002576

Kittel, A., Elsworthy, N., & Larkin, P. (2020). Decision-making performance in elite sport: A systematic review. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(18), 2097–2111. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1775196

Kondrič, M., Zagatto, A. M., & Sekulić, D. (2022). Perceptual-motor performance and reaction ability in table tennis athletes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1354. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031354

Le Runigo, C., Benguigui, N., & Bardy, B. G. (2021). Visual anticipation and expertise in tennis players. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 52, 101836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101836

Lubans, D. R., Pesce, C., & Tomporowski, P. D. (2022). Physical activity and cognitive function in youth. Sports Medicine, 52(4), 795–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01554-6

Magill, R. A., & Anderson, D. (2021). Motor Learning and Control: Concepts and Applications (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. https://www.mheducation.com

Mann, D. L., Williams, A. M., Ward, P., & Janelle, C. M. (2019). Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 41(3), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2018-0252

Morley, D., Till, K., Ogilvie, P., & Turner, A. (2023). Athlete development and performance monitoring in modern sport. Sports, 11(2), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports11020035

Pesce, C., Crova, C., Cereatti, L., Casella, R., & Bellucci, M. (2021). Physical activity and cognitive performance in educational settings. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), 7364. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147364

Pinder, R. A., Davids, K., Renshaw, I., & Araújo, D. (2020). Representative learning design and functionality of research in sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 42(2), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2019-0164

Roca, A., Ford, P. R., McRobert, A. P., & Williams, A. M. (2020). Perceptual-cognitive skills and anticipation in sport expertise. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(5), 559–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2019.1709990

Schmidt, R. A., Lee, T. D., Winstein, C. J., Wulf, G., & Zelaznik, H. N. (2019). Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis (6th ed.). Human Kinetics. https://us.humankinetics.com

Vaeyens, R., Lenoir, M., Williams, A. M., & Philippaerts, R. M. (2021). Talent identification and development programmes in sport. Sports Medicine, 51(8), 1545–1558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01480-7

Williams, A. M., Ford, P. R., Eccles, D. W., & Ward, P. (2021). Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport and its implications for talent development. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 33(2), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2019.1677244

Woods, C. T., McKeown, I., Rothwell, M., & Robertson, S. (2020). Ecological dynamics and athlete development. Sports Medicine - Open, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-020-00256-z

Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2016). Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(5), 1382–1414. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0999-9

Downloads

Published

2026-05-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Reaction and Response Speed ​​Tests in Racket Sports: Instruments, Reliability, and Learning Applications. (2026). COMPETITOR: Jurnal Pendidikan Kepelatihan Olahraga, 18(2), 4451-4461. https://doi.org/10.26858/cpjok.v18i2.982