Implementation of Learning Method Based On Modification of The Jump Athletics Game To Improve Interest In Learning Sports Education In Grade V of SDN Cibodas 3
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26858/cpjok.v18i2.705Kata Kunci:
Game-Based Learning; Athletics Modification; Learning Interest; Physical Education; Elementary StudentsAbstrak
Physical Education (PJOK) plays an essential role in developing students’ physical, cognitive, and affective domains; however, low student interest due to monotonous teaching methods remains a major challenge in elementary schools. This study aims to determine the effect of implementing a learning method based on the modification of jumping athletics games on increasing students’ learning interest in PJOK. This research employed a quantitative method with an experimental approach, using a one-group pre-test post-test design. The population consisted of all 36 fifth-grade students of SDN Cibodas 3. Data were collected through a learning interest questionnaire and a jumping athletics ability test administered before and after the treatment. Data analysis included a normality test using the Shapiro-Wilk method and hypothesis testing using a paired sample t-test. The results showed that the average pre-test score of students’ learning interest was 103.35, which increased to 128.42 in the post-test, with a mean difference of 25.09. The t-test results indicated that the calculated t-value (9.88) was greater than the t-table value (2.03) at a significance level of 0.05, leading to the rejection of H₀ and acceptance of H₁. These findings indicate a significant effect of the modified game-based learning method on improving students’ learning interest. In conclusion, the implementation of modified jumping athletics game-based learning creates a more engaging, interactive, and enjoyable learning environment, which significantly enhances students’ participation, motivation, and interest in PJOK learning.
Referensi
Abd Rahman, B. P., et al. (2022). The role of education in developing student potential. Journal of Education Research and Development, 6(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1234/jerd.v6i2.2022
Barnett, L. M., et al. (2016). Fundamental movement skills: An important focus. Sports Medicine, 46(12), 1785–1796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0498-9
Beni, S., Fletcher, T., & Ní Chróinín, D. (2017). Meaningful experiences in PE. European Physical Education Review, 23(3), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X16664012
Casey, A., & Goodyear, V. A. (2015). Can cooperative learning achieve outcomes? Sport, Education and Society, 20(6), 789–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2013.776852
Casey, A., Goodyear, V. A., & Armour, K. (2021). Digital technologies and learning in PE. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com
Chen, A., et al. (2017). Motivation in physical education. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 6(2), 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2016.05.001
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory. Motivation Science, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000040
Dyson, B., et al. (2016). Cooperative learning in physical education. Quest, 68(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2016.1152980
Fairclough, S., & Stratton, G. (2015). Physical activity levels in PE. Health Education Research, 20(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyg095
Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). SAGE. https://uk.sagepub.com
Harvey, S., & Jarrett, K. (2014). Game-based approaches in PE. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 19(3), 278–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2012.690379
Hastie, P. A., & Mesquita, I. (2016). Sport education model. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 35(2), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2015-0198
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2016). Interest development theory. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
Iswanto, & Widayati. (2021). Physical education learning outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia, 17(1), 45–53. https://journal.uny.ac.id
Kirk, D. (2010). Physical Education Futures. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com
Light, R. (2013). Game Sense for Teaching and Coaching. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com
Logan, S. W., et al. (2018). Motor skill development. Sports Medicine, 48(2), 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0816-7
Lubans, D. R., et al. (2016). Physical activity interventions. The Lancet, 388(10051), 1301–1312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30023-4
Magill, R. A., & Anderson, D. (2017). Motor Learning and Control. McGraw-Hill. https://www.mheducation.com
Metzler, M. (2017). Instructional Models for Physical Education. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com
Ntoumanis, N., et al. (2021). Motivation in sport and exercise. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 54, 101899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101899
Rink, J. (2020). Teaching Physical Education. McGraw-Hill. https://www.mheducation.com
Ward, P., et al. (2018). Content knowledge in PE teaching. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2016-0200
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Sulthon Hasan Hizbulloh, Z. Arifin, Asma Bara, Azhar Ramdhana Sonjaya (Author)
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
