The Development of Needs An Interactive Learning Model Based On Motion Analysis Videos In Table Tennis Service Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26858/cpjok.v18i2.927Keywords:
Motion Video; Interactive Learning Model; Table Tennis Service; Sports Education; Needs Analysis.Abstract
The rapid development of digital technology in higher education has created opportunities for the implementation of innovative learning approaches, particularly in sports education, which requires detailed movement visualization and technical skill mastery. In table tennis learning, service technique is a fundamental skill that demands precise coordination and systematic movement understanding. However, conventional learning methods often provide limited opportunities for students to observe, analyze, and evaluate movement execution in detail. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the need for developing an interactive learning model based on motion analysis videos in table tennis service learning at universities. This study employed a quantitative descriptive approach using a survey method. The participants consisted of 30 students enrolled in the table tennis course, selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using a Likert-scale questionnaire comprising 30 statement items. Following expert validation and empirical testing, 25 items were declared valid and reliable, with a Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient of 0.91. Data were analyzed using descriptive percentage analysis. The findings revealed that students’ need for the development of a motion analysis video-based learning model was categorized as very high. The learning effectiveness indicator obtained the highest percentage (90%), followed by motion visualization (88%), learning motivation (86%), ease of learning (84%), and understanding of service techniques (82%). These results indicate that students strongly require interactive learning media that facilitate detailed, systematic, and engaging learning experiences. In conclusion, motion analysis video-based learning has substantial potential to enhance the quality of table tennis service instruction in higher education. The novelty of this study lies in emphasizing motion analysis videos as an interactive learning and evaluation medium specifically designed for table tennis service skills, providing a foundation for future digital learning model development in sports education.
References
Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2021). Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approaches. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6310
Arsyad, A. (2019). Media Pembelajaran (Revised ed.). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. https://rajagrafindo.co.id
Baca, A., & Kornfeind, P. (2020). Rapid feedback systems for elite sports training. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(7), 789–798. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1721254
Bandura, A. (2018). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation and observational learning in sport. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 7(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000112
Bartlett, R. (2021). Introduction to Sports Biomechanics: Analysing Human Movement Patterns (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003168139
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(50), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x
Borg, W. R., Gall, M. D., & Gall, J. P. (2021). Educational Research: An Introduction (10th ed.). Pearson Education. https://www.pearson.com
Branch, R. M. (2020). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
Casey, A., Goodyear, V. A., & Armour, K. M. (2021). Digital technologies and learning in physical education: Pedagogical cases. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 26(3), 288–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2020.1799968
Chen, S., Chen, A., & Zhu, X. (2022). Technology-enhanced motivation in physical education learning environments. European Physical Education Review, 28(2), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X211048945
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (6th ed.). Sage Publications. https://us.sagepub.com
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (2019). User acceptance of computer technology: A theoretical perspective. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 00149. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149
Field, A. (2022). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (6th ed.). Sage Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). What works and doesn’t work with instructional video. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 465–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.015
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2021). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. https://www.mheducation.com
Gómez, M. A., Courel-Ibáñez, J., & Ibáñez, S. J. (2021). Video feedback and performance analysis in sports education. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 21(5), 765–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2021.1939382
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2022). Multivariate Data Analysis (9th ed.). Cengage Learning. https://www.cengage.com
Hodges, N. J., & Williams, A. M. (2020). Skill Acquisition in Sport: Research, Theory and Practice (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315180607
Jonassen, D. H. (2018). Learning to solve problems with technology: A constructivist perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(3), 781–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9585-1
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
Knudson, D. (2022). Fundamentals of Biomechanics (3rd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80904-0
Koekoek, J., Knoppers, A., & Stegeman, H. (2019). Digital technology and student engagement in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 38(2), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2018-0121
Malagoli Lanzoni, I., Di Michele, R., & Merni, F. (2018). A notational analysis of shot characteristics in top-level table tennis players. European Journal of Sport Science, 18(5), 689–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2018.1439181
Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). Systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009–2018. Computers & Education, 159, 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia Learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941351
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2020). Interactive multimedia learning: Theory and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09483-6
Munir. (2021). Pembelajaran Digital. Bandung: Alfabeta. https://www.alfabeta.co.id
OECD. (2021). 21st-Century Readers: Developing Literacy Skills in a Digital World. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en
Palao, J. M., Hastie, P. A., Cruz, P. G., & Ortega, E. (2020). The impact of video feedback on motor skill learning in physical education. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 15(4), 874–886. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2020.154.12
Prasetyo, Y. (2021). Video analysis in sports learning: Improving technical understanding and movement correction. Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia, 17(2), 105–114. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpji
Rein, R., & Memmert, D. (2021). Big data and video analysis in elite sports: Future directions. International Journal of Computer Science in Sport, 20(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2478/ijcss-2021-0001
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Sailer, M., Schultz-Pernice, F., & Fischer, F. (2021). Contextual facilitators for learning activities involving technology in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106794
Schmidt, R. A., Lee, T. D., Winstein, C., Wulf, G., & Zelaznik, H. (2019). Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis (6th ed.). Human Kinetics. https://us.humankinetics.com
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. https://www.alfabeta.co.id
Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument: How to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5(3), 28–36. https://hal.science/hal-02546799
Zawacki-Richter, O., & Jung, I. (2023). Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sri Murniati, Ervan Johan Wicaksana , Saharudin , Hadiyanto, Joka Novetra (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
