Ethical Principles and Bias in Physical Education Testing and Measurement: A Critical Review and Implications for Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26858/cpjok.v18i2.974Kata Kunci:
Ethical Assessment; Assessment Bias; Physical Education; Testing And Measurement; Teacher Assessment LiteracyAbstrak
Ethical principles and assessment bias have become increasingly important issues in Physical Education (PE) testing and measurement due to their significant influence on assessment validity, educational equity, and student learning outcomes. However, ethical considerations and bias reduction strategies are often discussed separately, limiting a comprehensive understanding of fair assessment practices in PE. This study aimed to critically examine ethical principles and assessment bias in PE testing and measurement and to identify their implications for teachers. The study employed a critical literature review approach by analyzing peer-reviewed articles published between 2016 and 2026 from Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Google Scholar, SINTA, and Garuda databases. A total of 287 records were initially identified, and after screening and eligibility assessment, 42 studies were included in the final review. The findings revealed that fairness and equity were the most frequently discussed ethical principles (92.86%), followed by transparency (83.33%), inclusivity (78.57%), accountability (71.43%), and confidentiality (64.29%). Gender bias (73.81%) and teacher expectancy bias (69.05%) emerged as the most common forms of assessment bias. Furthermore, biased assessment practices were associated with reduced validity (85.71%), student demotivation (80.95%), and inequitable learning opportunities (76.19%). Teacher assessment literacy training (90.48%) was identified as the most effective strategy for minimizing bias. In conclusion, ethical assessment principles serve as essential mechanisms for reducing bias, improving assessment quality, and promoting equitable learning experiences in Physical Education.
Referensi
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2018). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association. Retrieved from https://www.testingstandards.net
Bennett, R. E. (2018). Educational assessment: What future? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(4), 325–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441800
Brookhart, S. M. (2017). How to give effective feedback to your students (2nd ed.). ASCD. Retrieved from https://www.ascd.org
Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (2019). Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315749136
Camacho-Miñano, M. J., León-Guereño, P., & García-Calvo, T. (2021). Gender equity in physical education assessment: Challenges and opportunities. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 26(5), 487–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2020.1849595
Campbell, E. (2018). Professional ethics in teaching: Towards the development of a code of practice. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(10), 929–941. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1384118
CAST. (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2. CAST Professional Publishing. Retrieved from https://udlguidelines.cast.org
Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2019). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3520
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., ... & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
Green, S. K., Johnson, R. L., Kim, D. H., & Pope, N. S. (2021). Ethics and fairness in educational assessment: Contemporary perspectives. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 40(2), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12408
Hay, P., & Penney, D. (2021). Assessment in physical education: A sociocultural perspective. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003158707
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. Retrieved from https://curriculumredesign.org
Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 542–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533
Kane, M. T. (2016). Explicating validity. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199354498.001.0001
Ladson-Billings, G. (2021). Culturally relevant pedagogy: Asking a different question. Teachers College Record, 123(5), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812112300502
Lane, S., Raymond, M. R., & Haladyna, T. M. (2021). Handbook of test development (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429345197
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2022). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson Education. Retrieved from https://www.pearson.com
Lund, J., & Veal, M. L. (2020). Assessment-driven instruction in physical education and physical activity (2nd ed.). Human Kinetics. Retrieved from https://us.humankinetics.com
Maxwell, B., Tremblay-Laprise, A. A., Filion, M., Boon, H., Daly, C., Van den Hoven, M., ... & Walters, S. (2021). A five-country survey on ethics in teacher education. Journal of Moral Education, 50(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2019.1692811
Mislevy, R. J., Almond, R. G., & Lukas, J. F. (2021). A brief introduction to evidence-centered design. ETS Research Report Series, 2021(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12317
Newton, P. E., & Shaw, S. D. (2016). Validity in educational and psychological assessment. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473915091
Rao, K., Smith, S. J., & Lowrey, K. A. (2022). Universal Design for Learning and inclusive assessment. Journal of Special Education Technology, 37(2), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434211007818
Sensoy, Ö., & DiAngelo, R. (2017). Is everyone really equal? An introduction to key concepts in social justice education (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press. Retrieved from https://www.tcpress.com
SHAPE America. (2020). National standards and grade-level outcomes for K–12 physical education. SHAPE America. Retrieved from https://www.shapeamerica.org
UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education—All means all. UNESCO Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/gem-report
Xi, X. (2021). Fairness, validity, and justice in educational assessment. Language Testing, 38(3), 349–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322211002141
Zumbo, B. D. (2017). Consequences, validity, and fairness. In B. D. Zumbo & A. M. Hubley (Eds.), Understanding and investigating response processes in validation research (pp. 1–15). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56129-5_1
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Ricardo Valentino Latuheru (Author)

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

















